Legal Opinion

Yamada v. Natural Disaster Claims Commission

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1973No. 5223PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*622OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LEVINSON, J.

This dispute is the culmination of years of administrative wrangling over the value of property losses suffered by the appellants as a result of natural disasters and, as such, it presents us with a case of first impression regarding the power of an administrative commission to initiate reconsideration of its prior decisions.

The facts are as follows: The Island of Hawaii, where the appellants’ property is located, suffered two natural disasters in 1960, a volcanic eruption and a tsunami (tidal wave). As a consequence, in 1961 the Hawaii legislature created a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Handlon v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. Cities Service Oil Co. v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Morgan v. Planning Department, County of KauaiHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State Ex Rel. Kobayashi v. ZimringHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hupp v. Employment Security Commission of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. OmoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API