State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of criminal activity in drugs (ORS 167.207). He appeals, asserting two assignments of error. One is that the court erred in denying his motion for judgment of ■acquittal. The basis of the motion was that there was insufficient evidence that he had possession of the heroin that constituted the basis of the charge.
There was evidence from which the jury could have found that the police, armed with a search warrant to search a single family house where defendant lived with two of his children, arrested the defendant as he was driving away from his home. No…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. OareOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ZaunerOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. RushOregon Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ZaehringerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974