Legal Opinion

Crisp, Courtemanche, Meador & Associates v. Medler

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 1983No. 57511PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYDSTON, Judge.

Client Elma Medler appeals from summary judgment granted in favor of Crisp, Courtemanche, Meador and Associates, a court reporter partnership (Reporter) for services rendered in preparing a transcript. Medler appeals on the sole ground that the case was not ripe for summary judgment. Based on our review of the record, we disagree with Medler and affirm the decision below.

When summary judgment has been granted, the appellate court is required to examine the pleadings and evidentiary materials. If the record discloses either controverted material facts or if the uncontro-verted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Runyon v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Keel v. Titan Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Farmers Nat. Grain Corporation v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Moran v. Loeffler-Greene Supply CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007
  2. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. FelgerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
  3. Hays v. Monticello Retirement Estates, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. Agosta v. Southwest Breeders, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Shawnee v. Wholesale Enterprises, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API