Legal Opinion

Durfee v. Newkirk

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Case. Defendants bring error. The facts, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Plaintiffs brought action in trespass on the case in the Wayne circuit court, alleging that the defendants had sold to them 100 pounds of peppermint oil, representing to them falsely that the same was good and genuine peppermint oil, when, in fact it was dementholized oil, from which the active principle of good and genuine oil, to wit, menthol, had been eliminated to the knowledge of defendants. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the sum of $350, for which they had judgment.

The case, as made by the plaintiffs, was that in 1886 and 1S87, they were engaged in buying and selling…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Detroit Daily Post Co. v. McArthurMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Warren v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Stilson v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Wilson v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Watson v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Joba Const. Co., Inc. v. Burns & Roe, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Unibar Maintenance Services, Inc v. SaighMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Stratton v. JensenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Hink v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API