Unibar Maintenance Services, Inc v. Saigh
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
After a jury trial, Joseph Saigh and Lawrence Wells (hereafter defendants) were found liable for innocent or negligent misrepresentation and constructive and actual fraud. The jury returned a verdict of $1,282,575 in compensatory and exemplary damages and, subsequently, the trial court entered a judgment against defendants in the same amount. Defendants then moved for a new trial, judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), and for remittitur. The trial court denied all motions. Defendants now appeal as of right. We affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff is a maintenance and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- M&D, INC v. McCONKEYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Coates v. Bastian Brothers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Paschke v. Retool IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Mettler Walloon, LLC v. Melrose TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Chelsea Investment Group LLC v. City of ChelseaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Landin v. Healthsource Saginaw, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Alfieri v. BertorelliMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- John MacDonald, Jr. v. Thomas M. Cooley Law SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Carthan v. Snyder (In re Flint Water Cases)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.