Legal Opinion

Unibar Maintenance Services, Inc v. Saigh

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 2009No. Docket 279774PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

After a jury trial, Joseph Saigh and Lawrence Wells (hereafter defendants) were found liable for innocent or negligent misrepresentation and constructive and actual fraud. The jury returned a verdict of $1,282,575 in compensatory and exemplary damages and, subsequently, the trial court entered a judgment against defendants in the same amount. Defendants then moved for a new trial, judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), and for remittitur. The trial court denied all motions. Defendants now appeal as of right. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff is a maintenance and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. M&D, INC v. McCONKEYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Coates v. Bastian Brothers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Paschke v. Retool IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Mettler Walloon, LLC v. Melrose TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Chelsea Investment Group LLC v. City of ChelseaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Landin v. Healthsource Saginaw, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Alfieri v. BertorelliMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. John MacDonald, Jr. v. Thomas M. Cooley Law SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. Carthan v. Snyder (In re Flint Water Cases)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API