Legal Opinion
Lurensky v. Wellinghoff
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 7, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2008-1199PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to me by Judge Kennedy for the purpose of handling all dis covery and discovery-related disputes. Before me is plaintiffs Second Motion to Compel the Production of Documents [# 53] (“PI. Mot.”). On April 9, 2010, Judge Kennedy referred the ease to mediation and stayed all remaining deadlines. In light of that order, I sua sponte stayed plaintiffs motion on April 12, 2010 until the conclusion of the mediation period. On June 11, 2010, the parties filed a joint status report indicating that mediation was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Jackson Hospital Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Burlington Insurance v. Okie Dokie, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Mitchell v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Earthworks v. U.S. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Slate v. American Broadcasting CompaniesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Pietrangelo v. Refresh Club, IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022