Nolting v. National Bank
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree pronounced by the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond in a suit in chancery, wherein the appellee was the complainant, and the appellant and others were the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtPhlegar, J.
By a contract, dated January 4, 1892, it was agreed between W. O. Bolting and Davis & Gregory Company (a partnership) that he should act as their cashier for the sale of tobacco at a warehouse in Richmond, and should procure the money to pay the farmers for their tobacco, on the days of sales, receive all proceeds of sales, make all deposits, sign all checks, and have full supervision and control of the collection of the buyers’ bills. *56Bor the purpose of securing to Bolting the moneys he might advance, and in consideration of what he was to do-, “all of the proceeds of the sales of tobacco,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- National Bank v. NoltingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Falkland v. . St. Nicholas Nat'l B'k of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Dingus v. Minneapolis Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1900
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wood v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Home Bank for SavingsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
- McRitchie v. Atlanta Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- National Acceptance Co. of America v. Virginia Capital BankDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1980
- Norfolk Railway & Light Co. v. CorlettoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.