Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Home Bank for Savings

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1916PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison County. Suit by the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Compaq a'gainst the Home Bank for Savings. From a decree for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Midler, Judge:

Plaintiff declining to amend, its bill by the decree appealed from was dismissed on demurrer.

As surety on the bond of Dever Boring, administrator of the estate of Rachael M. Boring, deceased, plaintiff seeks a recovery from defendant on equitable grounds of the sum of eight hundred and sixteen dollars and seventy three cents, the amount which it was required to and did pay for the default of said administrator.

The grounds or theories upon which defendant’s alleged liability is predicated are: First, that during the years 1909 and 1910, it received from Boring, administrator,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Union Stock Yards Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Duckett v. National Mechanics' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  4. McNeil v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Batchelder v. Central National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bischoff v. . Yorkville BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Meyers v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Rodgers v. Bankers National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Bourne v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API