Shamrock Towing Co. v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). That the fire started on the dump and spread to the scows seems to iis borne out by substantially all the reliable evidence. It is quite true that all the testimony cannot be reconciled, but this' is perhaps accounted for by the position of the witnesses, and their excitement at the time. Several came upon the scene after the first scow was ablaze; several were badly placed to observe; some were perhaps interested not to have the fire, start ashore. It is difficult in such eases to reach an absolute conclusion, and we recognize that the material on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Compania Bilbaina De Navegacion, De Bilbao v. Spanish-American Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McKell v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- American Lumber & Mfg. Co v. Atlantic Mill & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- The CutchogueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Shamrock Towing Co. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Cacey v. Virginian Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Cacey v. Virginian Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.