Legal Opinion
Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L.P.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 3, 1995No. 89 Civ. 4900 (RWS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs William and Eleanor Monaghan (the “Monaghans”) have moved to enforce an oral agreement of settlement between them and defendant SZS 33 Associates, L.P. (“SZS”). Also, SZS sought to enforce a contractual indemnification provision under an easement agreement (the “1935 Easement Agreement”) against Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (“Port Authority”) and the Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation (“PATH”) (together “Port Authority/PATH”) in the course of a trial between SZS and Port Authority/PATH.
For the reasons set forth below, the Monaghans’…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Rjr Nabisco, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Sears Realty Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Ostman v. St. John's Episcopal HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Yesh Diamonds, Inc. v. Yashaya (In Re Yashaya)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Freedberg v. LandmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.