Legal Opinion
The Cutchogue
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 1, 1926No. 225PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The Lehigh Valley Railroad Company’s float No. 2003, in tow of the Cutehogue, was damaged while she was being shifted on a single head line from the float bridge of the Long Island Railroad Company to the Yellow Pine dock. The float got out of control and came into collision with a Lackawanna float, which was made fast at the Yellow Pine dock.
The defense interposed was that the No. 2003 was being towed under a contract which provided that such towing was at the risk of the tow, and that the tug employed in the service should not be liable in any event for any damages…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- McWilliams Bros. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Pennsylvania R. v. M. McGirr's Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Hall-Scott Motor Car Co. v. Universal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Great Lakes Towing Co. v. American S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Shamrock Towing Co. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.