Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Gunter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1966No. 280PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RodmaN, E.J.

Plaintiff’s sole exception and assignment of error is to the rendition of the judgment. He does not challenge the finding of fact that the contract was breached in May 1960. That finding is based on plaintiff’s testimony that “he (Gunter) was forming Gunter and Cooke Company to sell these drives. This was not in keeping with our agreement made April 3, and so I saw that these drives would be beyond my control if he went out with Gunter and Cooke Corporation just to sell them.” •

Thereafter some machines were sold by defendants. Plaintiff and Gunter had a conference in Charlotte in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Jewell v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Willetts v. WillettsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Bennett v. ANSON BANK & TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Abram v. Charter Medical Corp. of Raleigh, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Little v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Speck v. North Carolina Dairy Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Chisum v. CampagnaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
  5. Chisum v. CampagnaNorth Carolina Business Court · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API