Legal Opinion

Speck v. North Carolina Dairy Foundation, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1983No. 8210SC920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The central issue on appeal is whether plaintiffs’ cause of action is barred by the three-year limitations period of G.S. 1-52. Because the record contains evidence supporting plaintiffs’ allegations of a breach of fiduciary duty, we hold that their claim may fall under the ten-year limitations period of G.S. 1-56 and therefore summary judgment was not proper.

Summary judgment for the defendants is proper only if the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs shows no genuine issue of material fact and that the defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Fulp v. FulpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Bowen v. DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adams v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Baars v. Campbell University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Rhône-Poulenc Agro S.A. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
  5. Volumetrics Medical Imaging, Inc. v. ATL Ultrasound, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API