Legal Opinion

Friess v. Mortgage Law Firm PC

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 2, 2024No. 3:24-cv-08180Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Julie D Friess, No. CV-24-08180-PCT-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Mortgage Law Firm PC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Julie Friess’s motion for a temporary 16 restraining order (“TRO”). (Doc. 15.) The motion, filed on September 30, 2024, seeks to 17 bar a trustee’s sale of Plaintiff’s home that is scheduled for October 3, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. 18 (Doc. 15-1 ¶ 2.) The Court has now reviewed Plaintiff’s motion papers and the other filings 19 in the record and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Shell Offshore, Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Samuel Lopez v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California v. WuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API