Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California v. Wu
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Our disposition in this ease was affirmed by the Supreme Court. Christian Legal Soc’y v. Martinez, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 2971, 2995, 177 L.Ed.2d 838 (2010). On remand, Christian Legal Society (“CLS”) asks us to remand with instructions that the district court consider its claim that Hastings College of Law selectively ap*485plies its Nondiscrimination Policy against CLS. Before the Supreme Court, CLS contended that “[t]he peculiarity, incoherence, and suspect history of the all-comers policy all point to pretext.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted) (alteration in original). The majority…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Clark v. JeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Johnson v. Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Caremark, LLC v. Chickasaw NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Mohamed Sabra v. Maricopa County Community CollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.