Legal Opinion · Dissent

Glasgow, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 2004Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

I respectfully dissent to the majority’s thoughtful analysis of this novel issue. I believe that the Department’s decision constitutes a hyper-technical interpretation of its bidding requirements, exulting form over substance, and resulting in an unnecessary additional burden on taxpayers in the amount of $432,626.

At the outset, I question whether Glasgow’s submission was deficient. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that Glasgow faded to “submit” the necessary DBE information on time, and I question the majority’s acceptance of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. SeligmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Gaeta v. Ridley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Muncy Area School District v. GardnerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Shaeffer v. City of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. McCloskey v. Independence Cablevision Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API