Glasgow, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
I respectfully dissent to the majority’s thoughtful analysis of this novel issue. I believe that the Department’s decision constitutes a hyper-technical interpretation of its bidding requirements, exulting form over substance, and resulting in an unnecessary additional burden on taxpayers in the amount of $432,626.
At the outset, I question whether Glasgow’s submission was deficient. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that Glasgow faded to “submit” the necessary DBE information on time, and I question the majority’s acceptance of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. SeligmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Gaeta v. Ridley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Muncy Area School District v. GardnerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Shaeffer v. City of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- McCloskey v. Independence Cablevision Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983