State v. Tarantino

EXUM, Chief Justice.

The sole issue this case presents is whether, in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Dunn v. United States, 480 U.S. —, 94 L.Ed. 2d 326 (1987), the Court of Appeals correctly upheld the trial court’s decision to grant defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized from his building because the information furnishing probable cause for the search warrant was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. We answer yes, and affirm the Court of Appeals.

I

On 10 April 1986 Judge Gray conducted a hearing on defendant’s motion…