State v. Church
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MCCRODDEN, Judge.
In his only assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized from his residence, premises, and outbuildings. This assignment of error requires us (I) to review the law enforcement officers’ actions in discovering defendant’s marijuana in plain view and, in so doing, to revisit, in light of Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128, 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990), whether items seized under the “plain view” doctrine must be discovered inadvertently; (II) to determine whether a law enforcement officer who had no warrant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. PrevetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. TarantinoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Nicholas Omar MidgetteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- State v. MickeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- United States v. WurieDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- State v. BeveridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.