Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1979No. 7823SC988PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Defendant’s appeal raises issues of the right of an individual to come to the aid of himself or another in defending against an arrest being effected by the alleged excessive use of force. Defendant contends that based upon the evidence presented in this case, he is entitled to an instruction defining his right to self-defense and defense of another. We agree.

It is elementary that the trial court, in its instructions to the jury, is required to declare and explain the law arising on the evidence. See G.S. 15A-1232. It, therefore, follows that the trial court is required to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. WestlundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  5. State v. Clark.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. William C. Wardlaw v. William R. Pickett, Deputy United States MarshalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  3. State v. GelinasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  4. Morrison v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1990
  5. Williams v. City of Jacksonville Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API