Legal Opinion

Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1999No. B129300PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WEISMAN, J. *

I. Introduction

Petitioners Washington Mutual Bank, FA, Washington Mutual Bank, FA, as successor in interest to Great Western Bank, F.S.B., and Washington Mutual Bank, FA, formerly known as American Savings Bank, FA (petitioners) petitioned this court for a writ of mandate to vacate and set aside the ruling of respondent Los Angeles Superior Court overruling a demurrer petitioners had filed to the second amended class action complaint filed by plaintiffs and real parties in interest Paul E. Brown et al. (plaintiffs) as individuals and on behalf of all others similarly…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Rose v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Roskind v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Pemberton v. Nationstar Mortg. LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API