Legal Opinion

Neely v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1942No. 22049Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

This case was submitted without the benefit of brief or oral argument, without statement of facts and with a bill of exception which could not be appraised in the absence of statement of facts. On motion for rehearing, however, our attention has been called for the first time to a defect in the complaint, the jurat to which reads as follows:

“Sworn to and subscribed by J. B. Wilkinson, a credible person, before me, on this the------day of August, A. D. One Thousand Nine Hundred and Forty-one.
“Joe Gordon
“Gray County, Texas.”

The defect is perfectly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shurbet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Stanley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API