Legal Opinion

State v. Pena-Rojas

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 27, 2003No. 2001-234-C.A., 2002-362-M.PPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this statutory-rape case, the defendant, Rafael Pena-Rojas, 1 challenges the trial justice’s rulings sustaining the state’s objections to certain questions that his attorney posed to him during his direct examination of the defendant at his criminal trial. On his appeal and in his petition for certiorari, the defendant contends that his attorney intended to elicit evidence that the defendant was free of the sexually transmitted diseases that the victim said she had contracted after engaging in the sexual activity in question.

A Superior Court jury found defendant guilty of one count…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BotelhoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  2. State v. HazardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  3. State v. CoteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  4. Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Millman v. MillmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GrayhurstSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  2. State v. SilviaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  3. State v. HakSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  4. Boscia v. SharplesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  5. State v. MorenoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API