Legal Opinion
Demesme v. Montgomery County Government
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 12, 1999No. CIV. L-97-1112PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LEGG, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The issues have been fully briefed, and the Court finds that a hearing is not necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.1997). For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum, the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment shall be, by separate Order, GRANTED.
Background
The plaintiff, Emmanuel J. Demesme, Jr., worked from 1978 until his dismissal in 1997 for the Montgomery County Department of Transportation (“the County”). 1 Demesme drove buses for the County’s Ride On bus service until 1991, when he…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Booth v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Luy v. Baltimore Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Higginbotham v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Bailey-El v. Housing Authority of Baltimore CityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- Bryan v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.