Simmons v. Detroit, City of
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LATAUSHA SIMMONS, Case No. 2:23-cv-10087 Plaintiff, HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III v. CITY OF DETROIT, et al., Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [2] AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT [1] Plaintiff Latausha Simmons filed a pro se complaint against the City of Detroit and several officials employed by Detroit. ECF 1. Plaintiff also applied to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF 2. Because a complaint is considered filed “only when [in forma pauperis] status is granted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wells v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Hensley Manufacturing, Inc. v. Propride, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.