Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Beasley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2018No. 2014–0313Published

1ConcurrenceFischer, J.

{¶ 1} I concur in the decision to deny the motion for reconsideration filed by appellant, Richard Beasley. I write separately, however, to point out that Beasley waived his first argument in support of reconsideration and that well-settled case law runs directly contrary to that argument.

{¶ 2} Beasley argues that because the Office of the Attorney General represented the state in this case, Justice R. Patrick DeWine, son of Attorney General Mike DeWine, was required to recuse himself from this case because a "reasonable and objective observer would harbor serious doubts about the judge's…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Williams v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Buckingham Coal Co. v. SantoOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. United States v. CaggianoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Adair v. State, Dept. of Educ.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API