Kuykendall v. Proctor
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLaee, J.
In determining the sufficiency of a complaint to withstand a demurrer filed on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, all facts well pleaded in the complaint, including inferences of fact reasonably deduced therefrom and the provisions of any document attached to and made a part of the complaint, are deemed admitted by the demurrer, but conclusions of the pleader as to the proper construction of such instrument are not admitted by the demurrer and are not binding upon the court. Gay v. Thompson, 266 N.C. 394, 146 S.E. 2d 425; McLeod v. McLeod, 266…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Collister v. . FassittNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Gay v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Burke v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Culp v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Austin v. U.S. BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- In re Estate of SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- Estate of Jerome Mittleman, Deceased, Henrietta Mittleman, Irving B. Yochelson and Solomon Grossberg, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Lineback Ex Rel. Hutchens v. StoutCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- First National Bank of Catawba County v. EdensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.