Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 16, 1982No. 676-80LPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ opposition thereto. We have heard oral argument. For the reasons discussed below, we deny defendant’s motion for summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.

The plaintiffs in this case are California farmers who reside in, and purchase water from, the Westland Water District. The Water District, in turn, purchases its water *824from the Federal Government. To ultimately receive this federal water, plaintiffs were required to enter (and between 1969 and 1975 did enter) a number of recordable contracts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  3. Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Yankee Atomic Electric Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  3. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Hedstrom Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Asco-Falcon II Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API