Legal Opinion

Lane v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 21, 2008No. 2 CA-IC 2007-0007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this statutory special action, petitioner Kelly Lane challenges the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) ruling that Lane’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits was noncompensable because his injury from a gunshot wound did not arise out of and occur in the course of his employment as a police officer. For the following reasons, we set aside the award.

¶ 2 The following facts are essentially undisputed. After his claim for workers’ compensation benefits was denied by the City, Lane requested a hearing before an ALJ. At the hearing, Lane, an officer for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McCloud v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Aitken v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schultz v. Pojoaque Tribal Police Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Schultz Ex Rel. Schultz v. Pojoaque Tribal Police DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Cardenas v. amavizca/special FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Ibarra v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Reyes v. pinnacle/standardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API