Legal Opinion
PROPOSITION 103 ENFORCEMENT v. Quackenbush
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1998No. B112528Published
1Opinion of the Court
64 Cal.App.4th 1473 (1998)
PROPOSITION 103 ENFORCEMENT PROJECT, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CHARLES QUACKENBUSH, as Insurance Commissioner, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents; INSURANCE BROKERS AND AGENTS OF THE WEST, INC., Intervener and Respondent.
Docket No. B112528.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.
June 24, 1998.
COUNSEL
Edward P. Howard, Gus T. May and Laura N. Diamond for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Roy Ulrich as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, David S. Chaney and Diane Spencer Shaw, Deputy Attorneys…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Otis v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- American Academy of Pediatrics v. LungrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.