Legal Opinion

Reed v. Barlow

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1941No. 11040PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

This is an action for damages alleged to have been sustained by lessors on account of the admitted failure of their lessees to offset producing oil wells on adjoining leases. On this theory Barlow and another, lessors, recovered damages of T. S. Reed and others, lessees, and the latter have appealed. Trial was by jury on special issues.

The parties have ignored the requirement (in Rule 421, Rules of Practice and Procedure in Civil Actions) that “every brief shall contain at the front thereof a subject index with page references where the discussion of the points relied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caulk v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. DappermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Anderson v. CaulkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Spence v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Kerr v. DorchesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Holloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Continental Bus System, Inc. v. BiggersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Moore v. GranthamTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Morgan v. Morgan, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  5. Temple v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API