Legal Opinion

Caulk v. Anderson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1931No. 5222PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

Plaintiff in error, John R. Caulk, brought this suit to- recover of defendants in error, T.- D. Anderson, Thomas H. Franklin, Frank G. Huntress and M. C. Judson, as executors of the will of Geo. W. Brackenridge, deceased, a balance of $10,000, alleged to be the reasonable .value of surgical and medical services rendered by plaintiff in error to said decedent. Plaintiff in error plead that Geo. W. Brackenridge was a highly successful business man of advanced age, owning an estate worth more than $1,000,000; that the services rendered by plaintiff in error involved his relief from great…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. CowserTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Spencer v. SchellTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Cameron Mill & Elevator Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. CutterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. YoungerTexas Supreme Court · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Continental Bus System, Inc. v. BiggersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Red River Valley Pub. Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Reed v. BarlowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Edwards v. West Texas HospitalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Huguley v. Board of Adjustment of City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API