Legal Opinion

Haretuer v. Klocke

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1986No. 50383PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment for respondent on a promissory note. The judgment was for $1725 plus costs. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The judgment is supported by the record and no error of law appears. Respondent’s motion to strike the record on appeal, taken with the case, is denied. No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment is affirmed, Rule 84.16(b), but respondent’s motion for damages for a frivolous appeal is granted, and the trial court is instructed to increase the amount of the respondent’s judgment by the sum of $750.

The appeal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Twin River Construction Co. v. Public Water District No. 6Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Hathman v. WatersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Duggins v. SimonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. Branson v. JordanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commerce Bank of Joplin v. ShallenburgerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Christeson v. BurbaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Carla Baker v. Bristol Care, Inc., d/b/a Bristol Manor, and David FurnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  4. Carla Baker v. Bristol Care, Inc., d/b/a Bristol Manor, and David FurnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API