Branson v. Jordan

CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Keith M. Jordan appeals from a $9,000 judgment in favor of plaintiff Leo Branson. Defendant claims error in a question asked him on cross examination and also in taxing the cost of a supplemental transcript. We affirm the judgment and deem the appeal frivolous, remanding the case with instructions to add a penalty. (Rule 84.19).

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence, plaintiff’s submission on the grounds of excessive speed and violating a traffic signal, nor the amount of damages. A brief summary will suffice.

Late at night, in…