Legal Opinion

International Fair & Exposition Ass'n v. Walker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1891PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChampuin, C. J.

At the first trial of this cause the defendant introduced no testimony, and the court below directed a verdict for the defendant. Upon the review of that record this Court reversed the judgment, and directed a new trial. 83 Mich. 386.

The case has been again tried substantially upon the same testimony upon the part of the plaintiff. The defendant introduced some testimony tending to show that when he subscribed it was represented to him that he should have an opportunity of inspecting the several sites offered before one was accepted, and also the part he took in the meeting held by the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Swartwout v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Livesey v. Omaha Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Warren v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. International Fair & Exposition Ass'n v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Thrasher v. Pike County RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Attorney General Ex Rel. O'Hara v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Klas v. Pearce Hardware & Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ada Dairy Ass'n v. MearsMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Peninsula Leasing Co. v. CodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API