Legal Opinion

Schulz v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Sec. 192.29 (5), Stats., directs the warning which must be placed at every railway-highway crossing.

“Danger Signs. Every railroad corporation shall maintain wherever its track crosses a public highway or street and near such crossing a large signboard with the following inscription, painted in large letters on each side: ‘Look Out For Cars,’ in such manner as to be visible on the highway or street at least a hundred feet distant on each side of such crossing, except that after May 1, 1935, any such signs repainted, replaced, or newly erected shall bear the inscription ‘Railroad Crossing’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bengston v. EstesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kurer v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  2. Schulz v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API