Legal Opinion
Fox v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 27, 1996No. C021394PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, J.
Dismissed by the Department of Corrections (Department) in March 1992 for offensive, unprofessional conduct, James Fox appealed to the Board, which upheld the adverse action. He then sought a writ of administrative mandamus in the trial court (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5), which denied his petition in April 1995. Undeterred by the trial court’s findings that there was substantial evidence of his “egregious and reprehensible” conduct and that his testimony to the contrary was “deliberate[] lie[s],” Fox nonetheless seeks a third level of review. Claiming a denial of due process…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Franz v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Rosenblit v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hooks v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- McLeod v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Independent Roofing Contractors v. California Apprenticeship CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- R.J. Land & Associates Construction Co. v. Kiewit-SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Parmar v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Merritt v. L.A. County Civil Service Commission CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Rivera v. Co. of Riverside CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.