Legal Opinion

Marino v. King

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2011No. 10-0854PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a summary judgment based on deemed admissions. By rule, a request for admission is considered admitted if a response is not timely served. Tex.R. Civ. P. 198.3. The response in this case was a day late, and the requested admissions were deemed admitted under the rule. The trial court granted a subsequent motion for summary judgment, based on these admissions, after the pro se litigant did not file a written response to the motion asking for them to be withdrawn. The court of appeals likewise affirmed the summary judgment, concluding that the litigant had waived…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wheeler v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Carpenter v. Cimarron Hydrocarbons Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sanders v. HarderTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Stelly v. PapaniaTexas Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. John David Adams v. Starside Custom Builders, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. James Cleveland v. Rob Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  3. In re WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Time Warner, Inc. and Time Warner Cable, LLC v. Dulio Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  5. in Re Commitment of Michael Elbert Young, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2013

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API