People v. Cobos
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant argues that the witness Destino was an accomplice as a matter of law in the intentional murder of James Amico. The People counter that though Destino was an accomplice as a matter of law in the earlier assault of and attempt to rob Amico, the murder was a later and separate crime and, in any event, the issue was not preserved. Defendant’s attorney moved for a trial order of dismissal at the close of the People’s case on the ground of insufficiency of Destino’s testimony because he was an accomplice…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. ConaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. ArceNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. DekleNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- People v. CabanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. BrelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. BesserNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.