People v. Dekle
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant moved for a trial order of dismissal but the only basis given for the motion was that the element of immediacy required for conviction of robbery was not proved because the knife displayed was closed, required two hands to open and defendant had but one hand free. The court charged that “‘Immediately’ means straight away, promptly, has its ordinary meaning — no more and no less. No specific time is required for immediately.” Defendant took no exception. Defendant thus failed to preserve for our…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. ConaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. StahlNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by107 opinions
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. CobosNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. GomezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.