People v. Besser
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Graffeo, J.
Defendants were convicted after a jury trial of enterprise corruption (see, Penal Law § 460.20). The primary contention asserted by each defendant on appeal concerns application of the CPL 60.22 (1) accomplice corroboration rule to an enterprise corruption prosecution. Defendants contend that accomplice corroboration was required for each pattern criminal act that supported a finding of guilt under the enterprise corruption statute. We conclude, however, the jury was properly charged that the testimony of the accomplices need not be corroborated for each pattern…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. HernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. RosenNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- People v. CabanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. ReomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. KancharlaNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. KorberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.