Legal Opinion

Atlantic City Electric Company v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 7, 1958No. 33-55PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiff sues for $84,105.60 of income tax paid by it for the year 1944. It claims that it should not have had to pay this tax because it was entitled to a credit which would have reduced its taxable income.

Section 26(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 26(h), provided that a public utility corporation, in computing its surtax net income, was entitled to a credit for, i. e., a deduction of, “the amount of dividends paid during the taxable year on its preferred stock.” The plaintiff was a public utility, and the stock in question qualified in all respects…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lynch v. HornbySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hellmich v. HellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Helvering v. Credit Alliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Foster v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Kohlsaat v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kentucky Utilities Co. v. GlennCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  2. Associated Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Cross v. United States of America, and CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Idaho Power Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. Utilities & Industries Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  5. Kentucky Utilities Company v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API