Kohlsaat v. Murphy
Supreme Court of the United States
Error' to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clifford
Repeal by implication of revenue and collection laws, except when the prior laws have been subjected to a general-'statutory revision, are not favored in legal decision, unless it appear that the prior provision has been- re-enacted in the new. regulation, or that the later act is repugnant to the former; and the Revised Statutes provide in express terms that,' whenever an a°t is repealed which repealed a former act,- such former act shall not thereby be revived unless' it shall be expressly so provided. Rev. Stat., sect. 12, p. 2.
Six invoices of merchandise were imported into the port of New…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Daviess v. FairbairnSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hellmich v. HellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Matthews v. MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Scott v. LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Metallic Extraction Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Territory of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.