Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1951No. 31629PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is a bastardy proceeding under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 1970 [P.P.C. § 12-1], et seq. The word “bastardy” is not a pretty one. While the meaning it usually connotes is a bit jarring, to say the least, the word, when given a fuller or expanded import, even then hardly denotes the emotions, the conduct, and the human factors jam-packed and brimming in the muddled human-relations situation it describes. All individuals are entitled to their legal rights and their day in court. But it would seem that legally trained minds could normally find a solution to the problems involved in bastardy…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. TiemanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Wheeler v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Eliason v. EliasonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State v. KritzerWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Tackett v. MilburnWashington Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KratzerWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. KlineWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Daves v. NastosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. Daves v. NastosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. State of Washington v. Benjamin E. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API