State v. Kritzer
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.
The appellant, Walter L. Kritzer, wa^ found guilty by a jury of assault in the second degree, anql, from the judgment, has taken this appeal.
The material facts which the jury must- have found in order to arrive at the verdict were that some horses belonging to the prosecuting witness, one G. W. McClelland, strayed onto the premises occupied by appellant; that, during his search for the horses, McClelland went to a place on a public highway where a road leading to the premises of appellant branched off, and, while there, appellant came out of his residence armed with a gun, which he pointed at…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. SchumanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. SpadoniWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. GottfreedsonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. StoneWashington Supreme Court · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. GoebelWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- State v. MundellIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. OswaltWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. SalleWashington Supreme Court · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.