Commonwealth v. Ferguson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DOWLING, Judge:
Appellant, Rene Ferguson; was tried before a jury and found guilty of rape and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse. His contentions, on direct appeal, concern the putative prosecutorial misconduct in the Commonwealth’s summation and cross-examination of Defendant.
The standards for judging prosecutorial misconduct are well established. Any caustic, ill-advised or otherwise improper remarks by the Commonwealth are not necessarily grounds for a new trial. Commonwealth v. Stoltzfus, 462 Pa. 43, 337 A.2d 873. Reversible error attaches only where: “. . . the unavoidable effect of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SimonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. McNealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DickersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. ParenteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.