Commonwealth v. Parente
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McEWEN, Judge:
Appellant, Wayne Párente, was tried before a jury and found guilty of rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, simple assault, and possession of an instrument of crime. He appeals, alleging prejudicial error in a number of judicial decisions and prosecutorial actions during the trial in the lower court. We will consider his allegations seriatim.
Appellant contends first that it was- error for the lower court to refuse to strike the victim’s testimony because her statement to the police had been lost by the police officer and was not available to defense counsel. Under Pa.R.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. GravelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. McNealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. StaffordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JudySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. LambSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.