Legal Opinion

United States v. Myers

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 31, 1913No. 1207PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 32584 (T. D. 33511).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Paragraph 204 of the tariff act of August 5, 1909, provides as follows:

* * * Telephone, trolley, electric light, and telegraph poles of cedar, * * * 10 per cent ad valorem.

Paragraph 712 of the same act gives free entry to “ logs and round unmanufactured timber.” The question in this case is, Under which of the foregoing paragraphs the merchandise here involved is entitled to entry?

No testimony was taken before the Board of General Appraisers.

In the record we learn by letter from the collector that the merchandise was cedar poles, peeled, 30 feet in length, and was assessed as telegraph poles…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MacNaughtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. BaxterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API