Legal Opinion
People v. Jones
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the sneakers because the evidence at the hearing supports the court’s finding that defendant voluntarily gave them to the police and that he was not in custody at the time. Once the police had information that the sneakers belonged to someone else, they were justified in retaining them.
The court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to sever the several counts of the indictment alleging the commission of rapes and attempted rapes on different dates. Following…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. JenkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. CasianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. MosleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. MastinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. GlogowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. OrtliebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994