People v. Jenkins
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
It was permissible to join the two robberies in a single indictment because the offenses were "the same or similar in law” (CPL 200.20, subd 2, par [c]). The defendant’s motion to sever was addressed to the trial court’s discretion (CPL 200.20, subd 3). On this record it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion as a matter of law in denying the defendant’s motion for a severance.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabeielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed in a…
2Cited by42 opinions
- People v. PierceNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. CasianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.