Legal Opinion

Rush University Medical Center v. Leavitt

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 1, 2008No. 07-3648, 08-2227PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

Rush University Medical Center believes that it has not received all of the Medicare payments to which it is entitled for fiscal year 1991. After an unduly prolonged administrative process, the Secretary of Health and Human Services resolved numerous contested issues against the Medical Center. On judicial review under 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(l), the district court made a decision mostly favorable to the Secretary’s position. 2007 WL 2669021, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66244 (N.D.I11. Sept. 4, 2007).

Unfortunately, it is impossible to tell from the judgment who won what. It…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich CollieriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Arlene Otis v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Forney v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Acadian Diagnostic Lab, L.L.C. v. Quality ToxicoloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. Specialized Seating, Inc. v. Greenwich Industries, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Phoenix Memorial Hospital v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Norma Cooke v. Jackson National Life InsuranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Dhillon v. John Muir HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API